Crash Assessments Recommend Small Automobile Rear-Seat Security Missing
Considered one of America’s two main automobile security testers made its crash assessments harder this yr. The outcomes haven’t been encouraging. However harder assessments are supposed to push increased requirements, so the end result might drive improved security expertise in the long term.
Associated: IIHS Offers Fewer Security Awards After Toughening Crash Assessments
America’s Two Crash Testing Companies
Many international locations crash-test vehicles, however America advantages from the work of two security testing organizations.
One is the federal authorities’s Nationwide Freeway Visitors Security Administration (NHTSA). It was not concerned on this spherical of assessments.
The opposite is just not a authorities effort. A gaggle of automobile insurance coverage corporations funds their very own security lab — the Insurance coverage Institute for Freeway Security (IIHS). Insurers earn more money when accidents are rarer and fewer lethal, so the insurance coverage business makes use of the IIHS to push the auto business to develop safer vehicles.
The institute’s assessments are typically considered harder than authorities assessments, partly as a result of it might modify its testing applications with no prolonged public remark interval.
That’s what it did this yr.
New, More durable Assessments
The IIHS has lengthy carried out a frontal-overlap crash check that represents a car crashing into one other barely offset, just like the crashes widespread in intersections. The check occurs at about 40 mph and mimics a automobile crashing right into a car of comparable measurement and weight.
In 2023, the company added a dummy to the rear seats, representing a 12-year-old little one.
The company charges automobiles as Good, Acceptable, Marginal, or Poor primarily based on the probability of accidents to the driving force and, now, second-row passenger.
The IIHS revealed its first spherical of the brand new assessments in March, utilizing a bunch of midsize SUVs. All of the automobiles protected their driver effectively, however the outcomes for rear-seat passengers had been worse. Simply 4 of the 13 SUVs examined earned a Good rating for safeguarding rear-seat passengers.
In the present day, the company launched related outcomes for a bunch of compact vehicles. They did worse.
Not one of the 5 vehicles examined earned a Good rating.
“These outcomes spotlight one of many key causes that we up to date our average overlap entrance crash check,” mentioned IIHS President David Harkey. “In all of the small vehicles we examined, the rear dummy ‘submarined’ beneath the seat belt, inflicting the lap belt to journey up onto the stomach and rising the chance of inside accidents.”
Submarining, the institute explains, causes the seatbelt “to slip from the hip bones onto the stomach, the place it might trigger inside accidents.
Within the three poor-rated automobiles, measurements taken from the rear dummy additionally confirmed a average or excessive threat of head, neck or chest accidents.”
Unhealthy Information Can Set off Adjustments
The institute says it “launched the up to date average overlap entrance check final yr after analysis confirmed that in newer automobiles, the chance of a deadly damage is now increased for belted occupants within the rear than for these in entrance.”
That’s not as a result of rear-seat security is getting worse. It’s as a result of front-seat security is getting higher. Entrance-seat passengers have airbags in entrance of them and infrequently have “superior seat belts which might be hardly ever obtainable in again.”
With its harder requirements, the institute might disgrace automakers into putting in higher seatbelts within the rear of most vehicles.
The Outcomes